|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910345137603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Hwang Sung-Don <1957-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Bureaucracy vs. democracy in the minds of bureaucrats : to what extent are these ideologies compatible with one another? / / Sung-Don Hwang [[electronic resource]] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York, : P. Lang, c1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (x, 262 p. ) : ill. ; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Major concepts in politics and political theory Bureaucracy vs. democracy in the minds of bureaucrats |
Major concepts in politics and political theory, , 1059-3535 ; ; vol. 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Bureaucracy |
Democracy |
Ideology |
Government - General |
Political Institutions & Public Administration - General |
Law, Politics & Government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [239]-252) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
; 1. Introduction -- ; pt. I. The Debates. ; 2. Debates about the Compatibility Thesis in the Field of Organizational Theory. ; 3. Debates about the Compatibility Thesis in the Field of Public Administration. ; 4. Specification of the Conceptual Components of, and the Relationships Between, Bureaucratic and Democratic Ideologies -- ; pt. II. The Evidence. ; 5. Strategy of Empirical Inquiry. ; 6. Empirical Findings and Discussions -- ; pt. III. Conclusion. ; 7. Summary and Suggestions for Further Research. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
"Bureaucracy vs. Democracy in the Minds of Bureaucrats deals with a central theme highlighted in debates about the principles of governing society: the relationship between bureaucracy and democracy. Taking the psycho-cultural approach, this book focuses on the extent to which the two ideologies are perceived as being compatible or incompatible with one another in the minds of bureaucrats. Within the frameworks of LISREL and Q. |
|
|
|
|