| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910715585703321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Balances on books of receipts and expenditures. Letter from the Comptroller of the Treasury, transmitting a report by the Register of the Treasury, of the balances on the books of receipts and expenditures which appear to have remained due and unsettled more than three years prior to Sept. 30, 1826. December 8, 1826. Read, and laid upon the table |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
[Washington, D.C.] : , : [publisher not identified], , 1826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (3 pages) : tables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
House document / 19th Congress, 2nd session. House ; ; no. 137 |
[United States congressional serial set ] ; ; [serial no. 154] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Accounts receivable |
Revenue |
Factory and trade waste |
Financial statements |
Legislative materials. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Batch processed record: Metadata reviewed, not verified. Some fields updated by batch processes. |
FDLP item number not assigned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910337834803321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Handbook of Human Dignity in Europe / / edited by Paolo Becchi, Klaus Mathis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2019.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (2 illus. in color. eReference.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Law - Philosophy |
Law - History |
Constitutional law |
Ethics |
Law - Europe |
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History |
Philosophy of Law |
Constitutional Law |
Moral Philosophy and Applied Ethics |
European Law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Human Dignity in Europe: Introduction -- Albania -- Andorra -- Austria -- Belgium -- Bosnia and Herzegovina -- Bulgaria -- Croatia -- Cyprus -- Czech Republic -- Denmark -- Estonia -- Finland -- France -- Germany -- Great Britain and Northern Ireland -- Greece -- Hungary -- Iceland -- Ireland -- Italy -- Kosovo -- Latvia -- Liechtenstein -- Lithuania -- Luxemburg -- Macedonian -- Malta -- Monaco -- Montenegro -- Netherlands.-Norway.-Poland -- Portugal -- Romania -- San Marino -- Serbia -- Slovakia -- Slovenia -- Spain -- Sweden -- Switzerland -- Vatican City State -- EU -- Human Dignity in Europe: Conclusion -- Human Dignity and the European Convention on Human Rights. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This handbook provides a systematic overview of the legal concept and the meaning of human dignity for each European state and the European Union. For each of these 43 countries and the EU, it scrutinizes three main aspects: the constitution, legislation, and application of law (court rulings). The book addresses and presents answers to important questions relating to the concept of human dignity. These questions include the following: What is the meaning of human dignity? What is the legal status of the respective human dignity norms? Are human dignity norms of a programmatic nature, or do they establish an individual right which can be invoked before court? Is human dignity inviolable? The volume answers these questions from the perspectives of all European countries. As a reaction to the barbaric events during World War II, human dignity (dignitas) found its way into international law. Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) states that “[a]ll human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” The starting point for developing the concept on a national level was the codification of human dignity in article 1, paragraph 1 of the German Grundgesetz. Consequently, the concept of human dignity spread throughout Europe and, in the context of human rights, became a fundamental legal concept. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |