1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910337834403321

Autore

Chiassoni Pierluigi

Titolo

Interpretation without Truth : A Realistic Enquiry / / by Pierluigi Chiassoni

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2019

ISBN

3-030-15590-0

Edizione

[1st ed. 2019.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (284 pages)

Collana

Law and Philosophy Library, , 2215-0315 ; ; 128

Disciplina

340.1

340.115

Soggetti

Law - Philosophy

Law - History

Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History

Philosophy of Law

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Nota di contenuto

1. Introduction: The Path of Analytical Realism -- 2. Interpretation, Truth, and the Logical Forms of Interpretive Discourse -- 3. Interpretive Games -- 4. Taking Context Seriously -- 5. Frames v. Containers -- 6. Towards Pragmatic Realism -- 7. Legal Gaps -- 8. Judicial Fictions -- 9. Precedent -- 10. Defeasibility and Legal Indeterminacy -- 11. Legislation.

Sommario/riassunto

This book engages in an analytical and realistic enquiry into legal interpretation and a selection of related matters including legal gaps, judicial fictions, judicial precedent, legal defeasibility, and legislation. Chapter 1 provides an outline of the central theoretical and methodological tenets of analytical realism. Chapter 2 presents a conceptual apparatus concerning the phenomenon of legal interpretation, which it subsequently applies to investigate the truth-in-legal-interpretation issue. Chapters 3 to 6 argue for a theory of legal interpretation - pragmatic realism - by outlining a theory of interpretive games, revisiting the debate between literalism and contextualism in contemporary philosophy of language, and underscoring the many shortcomings of the container-retrieval view



and pragmatic formalism. In turn, Chapter 7, focusing on comparative legal theory, advocates an interpretation-sensitive theory of legal gaps, as opposed to purely normativist ones. Chapter 8 explores the connection between judicial reasoning and judicial fictions, casting light on the structure and purpose of fictional reasoning. Chapter 9 provides an analytical enquiry into judicial precedent, examining a variety of ideal-typical systems in terms of their normative or de iure relevance. Chapter 10 addresses defeasibility and legal indeterminacy. In closing, Chapter 11 highlights the central tenets of a realistic theory of legislation.