| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910462470403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Katz Ralph V |
|
|
Titolo |
The Search for the Legacy of the USPHS Syphylis Study at Tuskegee [[electronic resource] ] : Reflective Essays Based upon Findings from the Tuskegee Legacy Project |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Lanham, : Lexington Books, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (209 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
WarrenRueben |
EldersM Joycelyn |
WarrenRueben C |
PinnVivian W |
JonesJames H |
ReverbySusan M. <1946-> |
SatcherDavid |
NorthridgeMary E |
BraithwaiteRonald |
De la RosaMario |
WilliamsLuther S |
WillamsMonique M |
MaysVickie M |
IslerMalika Roman |
LewisR L'Heureux |
AubreyHarold L |
EarlRiggins R., Jr |
BrennanVirginia M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
African Americans -- Diseases -- History -- 20th century |
African Americans -- History -- United States |
History, 20th Century -- United States |
Human experimentation in medicine -- United States -- History |
Minority Groups -- United States |
Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation -- History -- United States |
Research Subjects -- United States |
Syphilis -- History -- United States |
Syphilis -- United States -- History -- 20th century |
United States. Public Health Service |
Withholding Treatment -- History -- United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Contents; Foreword: The Search for the Legacy of the USPHS Syphilis Study at Tuskegee; Preface; Introduction: Information Stream of the USPHS Syphilis Study at Tuskegee "Legacy," 1972-2010; Essay 1. From Exclusion to Inclusion: Participation in Biomedical Research and the Legacy of the Public Health Syphilis Study at Tuskegee; Essay 2. Of Thanks and Forgiveness; Essay 3. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study as a "Site of Memory"; Essay 4. Tuskegee Legacy: The Role of the Social Determinants of Health; Essay 5. Toward the Ethical Conduct of Science and a Socially Just World |
Essay 6. The Southern Male Placebo Study: The Good, the Bad, and the UglyEssay 7. Intent: The Key that Unlocks the Search for the Legacy of the USPH Syphilis Study at Tuskegee; Essay 8. The Untold Story of the Legacy of the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male: Or, Is the Legacy of Tuskegee Affirmative Action for White Researchers?; Essay 9. Legacy of Tuskegee; Essay 10. Racial Conspiracy and Research; Essay 11. African Americans and the Broader Legacy of Experience with the American Health Care Community: Parasites, Locusts, and Scavengers |
Essay 12. The USPHS Syphilis Study at Tuskegee: Rethinking the Horizons of BeneficenceEssay 13. Medicine, Research, and Socio-Cultural History: Reciprocal Relationships; Essay 14. Healing the Sin-Sick Soul: Reflections on the Syphilis Study; Appendix: The Seven Key Articles from the Tuskegee Legacy Project, as Read by All Essayists; Index; About the Editors and Contributors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The Search for the Legacy of the USPHS Syphilis Study at Tuskegee is a collection of essays from experts in a variety of fields seeking to redefine the legacy of the infamous Tuskegee Syphilis Study. The essayists place the legacy of the study within the evolution of racial and ethnic relations in the United States. Contributors include two leading historians on the study, two former United States Surgeons General, and other prominent scholars from a wide range of fields. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910337743303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Sikka Tina <1979-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Climate Technology, Gender, and Justice : The Standpoint of the Vulnerable / / by Tina Sikka |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2019.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (vi, 155 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
SpringerBriefs in Sociology, , 2212-6368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Environmental sociology |
Climatic changes |
Feminist theory |
Environmental sciences |
Environmental law, International |
Environmental law |
Environmental policy |
Environmental Sociology |
Climate Change |
Feminism |
Environmental Science and Engineering |
International Environmental Law |
Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction -- Chapter One: Geoengineering, Wind Solar Energy, Traditional Environmental Approaches To Gender -- Chapter Two: Feminist Standpoint Theory And Feminist Contextual Empiricism -- Chapter Three: Empirical Adequacy -- Chapter Four: Novelty -- Chapter Five:Ontological Heterogeneity -- Chapter Six: Complexity or Mutuality of Interaction -- Chapter Seven: Applicability to Human Needs -- Conclusion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book is the first to undertake a gendered analysis of geoengineering and alternative energy sources. Are either of these |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
technologies sufficiently attendant to gender issues? Do they incorporate feminist values as articulated by the renowned social philosopher Helen Longino, such as empirical adequacy, novelty, heterogeneity, complexity and applicability to human needs? The overarching argument in this book contends that, while mitigation strategies like solar and wind energy go much further to meet feminist objectives and virtues, geoengineering is not consistent with the values of justice as articulated in Longino's feminist approach to science. This book provides a novel, feminist argument in support of pursuing alternative energy in the place of geoengineering. It provides an invaluable contribution for academics and students working in the areas of gender, science and climate change as well as policy makers interested in innovative ways of taking up climate change mitigation and gender. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |