1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910309959003321

Autore

Walsh James Igoe

Titolo

Drones and support for the use of force / / James Igoe Walsh and Marcus Schulzke

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Ann Arbor, Michigan : , : University of Michigan Press, , [2018]

©2018

ISBN

0-472-90117-6

0-472-12429-3

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (253 pages)

Disciplina

358.4/14

Soggetti

Drone aircraft - Government policy - United States

War - Public opinion

War - Moral and ethical aspects

Drone aircraft - Moral and ethical aspects

War and society - United States

United States Military policy Public opinion

United States Public opinion

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Drones and support for the use of force -- Drones, casualties, and attitudes -- Drones and policy objectives -- Drones and moral hazard -- Drones and sensitivity to civilian harm -- Conclusion.

Sommario/riassunto

"Combat drones are transforming attitudes about the use of military force. Military casualties and the costs of conflict sap public support for war and for political and military leaders. Combat drones offer an unprecedented ability to reduce these costs by increasing accuracy, reducing the risks to civilians, and protecting military personnel from harm. These advantages should make drone strikes more popular than operations involving ground troops. Yet many critics believe drone warfare will make political leaders too willing to authorize wars, weakening constraints on the use of force. Because combat drones are relatively new, these arguments have been based on anecdotes, a handful of public opinion polls, or theoretical speculation. Drones and



Support for the Use of Force uses experimental research to analyze the effects of combat drones on Americans' support for the use of force. The authors' findings-that drones have had important but nuanced effects on support for the use of force-have implications for democratic control of military action and civil-military relations and provide insight into how the proliferation of military technologies influences foreign policy."