1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910300030703321

Autore

Wainwright Michael

Titolo

The Rational Shakespeare [[electronic resource] ] : Peter Ramus, Edward de Vere, and the Question of Authorship / / by Michael Wainwright

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Palgrave Macmillan, , 2018

ISBN

3-319-95258-7

Edizione

[1st ed. 2018.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (328 pages) : illustrations

Disciplina

822.308

Soggetti

Literature—History and criticism

Literature, Modern

Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616

Logic

Literary History

Shakespeare

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Chapter 1 Peter Ramus and the Basis of Logic -- Chapter 2 Thomas Smith, Edward de Vere, and William Cecil -- Chapter 3 Peter Ramus, Edward de Oxford, and the Basis of Logic -- Chapter 4 Ramus’s Method -- Chapter 5 The Strengths and Weakness of Ramism -- Chapter 6 Introduction: Ramism and Game Theory -- Chapter 7 The Banker and His Player -- Chapter 8 Oxford, Ramus, and Love’s Labour’s Lost -- Chapter 9 Oxford, Ramus, and Hamlet, Prince of Denmark -- Chapter 10 Deadlock and the Prisoner’s Dilemma in King John -- Chapter 11 Assurance Games in Antony and Cleopatra (Part 1) -- Chapter 12 Assurance Games in Antony and Cleopatra (Part 2) -- Chapter 13 Chicken in King Henry V (Part 1) -- Chapter 14 Chicken in King Henry V (Part 2) -- Chapter 15 Conclusion.

Sommario/riassunto

The Rational Shakespeare: Peter Ramus, Edward de Vere, and the Question of Authorship examines William Shakespeare’s rationality from a Ramist perspective, linking that examination to the leading intellectuals of late humanism, and extending those links to the life of Edward de Vere, Seventeenth Earl of Oxford. The application to



Shakespeare’s plays and sonnets of a game-theoretic hermeneutic, an interpretive approach that Ramism suggests but ultimately evades, strengthens these connections in further supporting the Oxfordian answer to the question of Shakespearean authorship.