|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910272342103321 |
|
|
Autore |
Kaptein Hendrik |
|
|
Titolo |
Analogy and exemplary reasoning in legal discourse / / edited by Hendrik Kaptein and Bastiaan van der Velden |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Amsterdam University Press, 2018 |
|
Amsterdam : , : Amsterdam University Press, , [2017] |
|
©2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (197 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Law - Methodology |
Analogy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (pages 177-187) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction -- Imitation and analogy / Amalia Amaya -- Indefeasible analogical argument / Scott Brewer -- Is analogy a form of legal reasoning? / Bartosz Brożek -- Analogical reasoning and extensive interpretation / Damiano Canale and Giovanni Tuzet -- Analogy and balancing : the partial reducibility thesis and its problems / David Duarte -- Analogy and balancing : a reply to David Duarte / Bartosz Brożek -- Analogy and balancing once again : a reply to Bartosz Brożek / David Duarte -- Argument by analogy in the law / Martin Golding -- Undoing damage by analogy : as if (almost) nothing happened, with notes on the meaning of everything / Hendrik Kaptein -- Analogy in the strict liability rules in the Dutch civil code / Bastiaan van der Velden. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book brings together contributions from leading figures in legal studies on analogy and related forms of reasoning in the law. Analogical reasoning-which relies on the concept of two different things being in some way like each other-is hugely important not just in the practice of law, but it is nonetheless strongly contested. This volume raises key questions like: What is the logical, argumentative, rhetorical, or just heuristic force of analogy in law? Is analogy really different from extensive interpretation, reasoning by precedent and |
|
|
|
|