| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNIORUON00293605 |
|
|
Autore |
BORTOLUSSI, Marisa |
|
|
Titolo |
Análisis teórico del cuento infantil / marisa Bortolussi |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
V, 150 p. : ill. ; 20 cm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
LETTERATURA INFANTILE - Studi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910255340203321 |
|
|
Autore |
Mukerji Nikil |
|
|
Titolo |
The Case Against Consequentialism Reconsidered / / by Nikil Mukerji |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2016.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (265 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Theory and Decision Library A:, Rational Choice in Practical Philosophy and Philosophy of Science, , 0921-3384 ; ; 51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Ethics |
Philosophy, Modern |
Political science |
Philosophy and social sciences |
Political science - Philosophy |
Modern Philosophy |
Philosophy of Law |
Philosophy of the Social Sciences |
Political Philosophy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction -- 1. Normative-Ethical Foundations -- 2. Metaethical Foundations -- 3. Methodology -- 4. Consequentialism and its Variants -- 5. Joining the Dots -- 6. Conclusion. . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book argues that critics of consequentialism have not been able to make a successful and comprehensive case against all versions of consequentialism because they have been using the wrong methodology. This methodology relies on the crucial assumption that consequentialist theories share a defining characteristic. This text interprets consequentialism, instead, as a family resemblance term. On that basis, it argues quite an ambitions claim, viz. that all versions of consequentialism should be rejected, including those that have been created in response to conventional criticisms. The book covers a number of classic themes in normative ethics, metaethics and, particularly, ethical methodology and also touches upon certain aspects of experimental moral philosophy. It is written in clear language and is analytic in its argumentative style. As such, the book should appeal to students, graduate students as well as professional academics with an interest in analytic moral philosophy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |