|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910255310803321 |
|
|
Autore |
Husar Jörg |
|
|
Titolo |
Framing Foreign Policy in India, Brazil and South Africa : On the Like-Mindedness of the IBSA States / / by Jörg Husar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2016.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (273 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Contributions to Political Science, , 2198-7289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
International relations |
Political communication |
Comparative politics |
Sociology |
International Relations |
Political Communication |
Comparative Politics |
Knowledge - Discourse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction -- IBSA: Three Like-Minded States?- A Comparative Approach to Foreign Policy Discourse Analysis -- Schools of Thought in Foreign Policy Discourse: the Potential for Convergence and Divergence Amongst IBSA States -- Official Framings of Foreign Policy: South-South Leadership as Starting Point of the IBSA Initiative -- Contested Roles: Investigating Societal Framings of Foreign Policy in India, Brazil and South Africa -- Conclusions: On the Like-Mindedness of the IBSA States -- Outlook: IBSA and the Shadow of BRICS -- Annex. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
<p>This book analyses the India, Brazil, South Africa Dialogue Forum (IBSA), focusing on the communalities and differences in the way foreign policy is conceptualized in its member states. Utilizing 83 interviews with foreign policy makers and experts, as well as the analysis of 119 foreign-policy speeches, the author traces key shifts in official foreign policy discourse. In order to evaluate the degree of support for key IBSA Dialogue Forum concepts within national |
|
|
|
|