1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910255305703321

Autore

Sharman Nick

Titolo

The Chicago Conspiracy Trial and the Press / / by Nick Sharman

Pubbl/distr/stampa

New York : , : Palgrave Macmillan US : , : Imprint : Palgrave Macmillan, , 2016

ISBN

1-137-55938-1

Edizione

[1st ed. 2016.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (253 p.)

Disciplina

320.014

Soggetti

Communication in politics

America - Politics and government

World politics

Political Communication

American Politics

Political History

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Introduction  -- Chapter 1: “My wishes are that a lawyer respect the court”: Initial representation of the trial and the lawyers’ arrest  -- Chapter 2: “The Orderly Administration of Justice”: The Chaining and Gagging of defendant Bobby Seale  -- Chapter 3: “The Use of Vile and Insulting Language”: The Voice of White Radicals  -- Chapter 4: “You are a disgrace sir, I say you are a disgrace, I really say you are a disgrace”: The Voice of Anti-War: Rennie Davis  -- Chapter 5: “The Exclusion of Authority”: Ramsey Clark’s Muted Evidence  -- Chapter 6: The Summation on the Conclusion of the Chicago Conspiracy Trial  -- Chapter 6: The Summation on the Conclusion of the Chicago Conspiracy Trial .

Sommario/riassunto

This book analyzes the newspaper coverage of one of America’s most famous and dramatic trials–the trial of the “Chicago 8.” Covering a five month period from September 1969 to February 1970 the book considers the way eight radical activists including Black Panther leader Bobby Seale, antiwar activists Tom Hayden, David Dellinger, and Rennie Davis, and leading Yippies, Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin are represented in the press. How did the New York Times represent Judge



Hoffman’s decision to chain and gag Bobby Seale in the courtroom for demanding his right to represent himself? To what extent did the press adequately describe the injustice visited on the defendants in the trial by the presiding Judge, Julius J Hoffman? The author aims to answer these questions and demonstrate the press’s reluctance to criticize Judge Hoffman in the case until the evidence of his misconduct of the trial became overwhelming.