1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910255218403321

Titolo

Narration as Argument / / edited by Paula Olmos

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2017

ISBN

3-319-56883-3

Edizione

[1st ed. 2017.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (XII, 234 p. 9 illus.)

Collana

Argumentation Library, , 1566-7650 ; ; 31

Disciplina

808

Soggetti

Logic

Discourse analysis

Literature—Philosophy

Epistemology

Pragmatics

Language and languages—Philosophy

Discourse Analysis

Literary Theory

Philosophy of Language

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters.

Nota di contenuto

Chapter 1. Introduction: Narratives, Narrating, Narrators; Paula Olmos -- Part I Narratives as Sources of Knowledge and Argument -- Chapter 2. Narratives and the Concept of Argument; Christopher Tindale -- Chapter 3. Arguing with Stories; Floris Bex and Trevor Bench-Capon -- Chapter 4. Narrative Fiction as a Source of Knowledge; Mitchell Green -- Chapter 5. Analogy, Presupposition and Transcendentality in Narrative Argument; Gilbert Plumer -- Chapter 6. Parables: Crossroads Between the Cognitive Theory of Metaphor and Argumentation Theory; Eduardo de Bustos -- Part II Argumentative Narratives in Context -- Chapter 7. Narratives and Pragmatic Arguments: Iven’s The 400 million; Paul van den Hoven -- Chapter 8. The Sample Convention, or, When Fictionalized Narratives. Can Double as Historical Testimony; Leona Toker -- Chapter 9. From Narrative Arguments to Arguments that Narrate; Adrien Frenay and Marion Carel -- Chapter 10. Narrative as Argument in Atul Gawande’s. “On Washing Hands” and “Letting Go”;



James Phelan -- Chapter 11. On Thought Experiments and other Narratives in Scientific Argument; Paula Olmos -- Chapter 12. How to Win Wars: The Role of the War Narrative; Tone Kvernbekk and Ola Bøe-Hansen.

Sommario/riassunto

This book presents reflections on the relationship between narratives and argumentative discourse. It focuses on their functional and structural similarities or dissimilarities, and offers diverse perspectives and conceptual tools for analyzing the narratives’ potential power for justification, explanation and persuasion. Divided into two sections, the first Part, under the title “Narratives as Sources of Knowledge and Argument”, includes five chapters addressing rather general, theoretical and characteristically philosophical issues related to the argumentative analysis and understanding of narratives. We may perceive here how scholars in Argumentation Theory have recently approached certain topics that have a close connection with mainstream discussions in epistemology and the cognitive sciences about the justificatory potential of narratives. The second Part, entitled “Argumentative Narratives in Context”, brings us six more chapters that concentrate on either particular functions played by argumentatively-oriented narratives or particular practices that may benefit from the use of special kinds of narratives. Here the focus is either on the detailed analysis of contextualized examples of narratives with argumentative qualities or on the careful understanding of the particular demands of certain well-defined situated activities, as diverse as scientific theorizing or war policing, that may be satisfied by certain uses of narrative discourse.