| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910254794003321 |
|
|
Autore |
Sangren P. Steven |
|
|
Titolo |
Filial Obsessions [[electronic resource] ] : Chinese Patriliny and Its Discontents / / by P. Steven Sangren |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Palgrave Macmillan, , 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2017.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (XVI, 381 p. 30 illus. in color.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Culture, Mind, and Society |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Cross-cultural psychology |
Ethnology—Asia |
Sociology |
Ethnography |
Cross Cultural Psychology |
Asian Culture |
Gender Studies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
1. Nezha, A Chinese Superboy -- 2. “Filial Piety” and Cultural Difference -- 3. Spirit Possession, Family Issues, and the Production of Gods Biographies -- 4. Ambivalence: The Fathers We Have and the Fathers We Wish to Have -- 5. The Social Production of Desire -- 6. Ancestor Worship, The Confucian Father, and Filial Piety -- 7. Woman as Symptom: Female Subjectivity in Chinese Patriliny -- 8. A Concluding Manifesto: Cultures as Modes of Production and Desire. . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book employs a broad analysis of Chinese patriliny to propose a distinctive theoretical conceptualization of the role of desire in culture. It utilizes a unique synthesis of Marxian and psychoanalytic insights in arguing that Chinese patriliny is best understood as, simultaneously, “a mode of production of desire” and as “instituted fantasy.” The argument advances through discussions and analyses of kinship, family, gender, filial piety, ritual, and (especially) mythic narratives. In each of these domains, P. Steven Sangren addresses the complex sentiments and ambivalences associated with filial relations. Unlike |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
most earlier studies which approach Chinese patriliny and filial piety as irreducible markers of cultural difference, Sangren argues that Chinese patriliny is better approached as a topic of critical inquiry in its own right. . |
|
|
|
|
|
| |