Introduction –Leslie Willcocks, Chris Sauer and Mary Lacity -- PART IV. INTERPRETIVE RESEARCH APPROACHES -- Chapter 11: Butler, T. (1998), “Towards a hermeneutical method for interpretative research in information systems,” JIT, Vol. 13, pp. 285-300 -- Chapter 12: Linden, T., and Cybulski, J. (2009), “Application of hermeneutics to studying an experience mining process,” JIT, Vol. 24, pp. 231-250 -- Chapter 13: Bygstad, B., and Munkvold, B.E., (2011), “Exploring the role of informants in interpretative case study research in IS,” JIT, Vol. 26, pp. 32-45 -- Chapter 14: Bunker, D., Kautz, K., and A. Anhtuan, (2008), “An exploration of information systems adoption: tools and skills as cultural artefacts – the case of a management information system,” JIT, Vol. 23, pp. 71-78 -- Chapter 15: Hsu, Carol; Backhouse, James; Silva, Leiser, (2014), “Institutionalizing operational risk management: an empirical study,” JIT, Vol. 29 59-72 -- PART V. ACTION RESEARCH APPROACHES -- Chapter 16: Baskerville, R., and Wood-Harper, A.T. (1996), “A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research,” JIT, Vol. 11, pp. 235-246 -- Chapter 17: Wastell, D., McMaster, T., and Kawalek, P (2007), “The rise of the phoenix: methodological innovation as a discourse of renewal,” JIT, Vol. 22, pp. 59-68 -- Chapter 18: Hughes, J., and Wood-Harper, T. (1999), “Systems development as a research act”, JIT, Vol. 14, pp. 83-94. . |