| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910252709503321 |
|
|
Autore |
Piotrowski David |
|
|
Titolo |
Morphogenesis of the Sign / / by David Piotrowski |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2017.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (XII, 299 p. 50 illus.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Lecture Notes in Morphogenesis, , 2195-1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Computational linguistics |
Neural networks (Computer science) |
Neurobiology |
Natural language processing (Computer science) |
Knowledge, Theory of |
Computational Linguistics |
Mathematical Models of Cognitive Processes and Neural Networks |
Natural Language Processing (NLP) |
Epistemology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book develops a morphodynamical approach to linguistic and sign structures as an integrated response to multilevel and interrelated problems in semiolinguistic research. More broadly, the content is linked to the realities of living speech through a connection (via the concept of diacriticity) with the Merleau-Pontian phenomenology, and beyond the formal determinations of a semiolinguistic system and its calculus. Such problems are mainly epistemological (concerning the nature and legitimate scope of semiolinguistic knowledge), empirical (concerning the observational device and the data’s composition), and theoretical (regarding the choice of a conceptual and formalized explicative frame). With regard to theory, the book introduces a morphodynamical architecture of linguistic signs and operations as a suitable mathematization of Saussurean theory. The Husserlian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
phenomenological signification of this formal apparatus is then established, and, from an empirical standpoint, its compatibility with neurobiological experimental results is discussed. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |