1.

Record Nr.

UNISA996363550303316

Autore

LABANCA, Nicola

Titolo

Bibliografia di storia militare 1984-1985 / Nicola Labanca

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Roma, : Fusa, 1985

Descrizione fisica

18 p. ; 24 cm

Disciplina

355.00945

Soggetti

Italia - Storia militare - Bibliografia - 1984-1985

Collocazione

XXXII.MISC. 41

Lingua di pubblicazione

Italiano

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

In testa al frontespizio: Stato maggiore dell'esercito, Ufficio storico

Supplemento a: Studi storivo militari 1984

2.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910220120703321

Autore

Harrell Margaret C.

Titolo

Managing adverse and reportable information regarding general and flag officers

Pubbl/distr/stampa

RAND Corporation, 2012

Santa Monica CA, : Rand Corporation, 2012

ISBN

9780833083128

0833083120

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource

Collana

RAND Corporation monograph series  Managing adverse and reportable information regarding general and flag officers

Disciplina

355.6/1

Soggetti

Military & Naval Science

Law, Politics & Government

Military Administration

United States Armed Forces Officers Management

United States Armed Forces Officers Discipline

United States Armed Forces Personnel management

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese



Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph

Nota di contenuto

Introduction -- Background -- Personnel processes -- Evaluation and discussion -- Recommendations.

Sommario/riassunto

"Title 10 of the U.S. Code requires consideration of adverse information by all general and flag officer boards. Also, adverse information is considered within the services and by the Secretary of Defense when nominating senior officers for assignment. The Secretary of Defense must issue certifications to the President and the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) regarding this information. However, there is a diversity of sources and terminology used to describe events of concern and individuals involved in such events, and recent individual cases have suggested possible gaps in the processes overall. This study is intended to describe and evaluate the reporting practices of the Department of Defense (DoD) and thus ensure that consistent, reliable information supports decisions regarding the management of general and flag officers. The processes described within are complicated and there exists no single authority. Multiple representatives from each service have reviewed the descriptions of the service processes."--Preface.