1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910450003303321

Titolo

Getting up to speed [[electronic resource] ] : the future of supercomputing / / Susan L. Graham, Marc Snir, and Cynthia A. Patterson, editors

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Washington, DC, : National Academies Press, c2005

ISBN

1-280-20862-7

9786610208623

0-309-54679-6

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (305 p.)

Altri autori (Persone)

GrahamSusan L

SnirMarc

PattersonCynthia A

Soggetti

High performance computing

Supercomputers

Electronic books.

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

"Committee on the Future of Supercomputing, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council of the National Academies."

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references.



2.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910220100803321

Autore

Martin Laurie T (Laurie Thayer), <1974->

Titolo

A systematic process to facilitate evidence-informed decisionmaking regarding program expansion

Pubbl/distr/stampa

RAND Corporation, 2014

[Place of publication not identified], : Rand Corporation, 2014

ISBN

0-8330-8483-6

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource

Collana

RAND toolkit  A systematic process to facilitate evidence-informed decisionmaking regarding program expansion

Disciplina

362.10973

Soggetti

Medical care - United States - Evaluation

Mental health services - United States - Evaluation

Brain - Treatment - Evaluation - Wounds and injuries - United States

Health services administration

Evidence-based medicine

Brain Injuries - rehabilitation

Military Personnel - psychology

Mental Health Services

Evidence-Based Medicine

Program Evaluation

Evaluation Studies as Topic

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph

Sommario/riassunto

Despite supporting more than 200 psychological health and traumatic brain injury programs, the Department of Defense lacks a way to develop, track, and assess the performance of this portfolio. RAND researchers developed a potential model and tools to support a centralized, systematic, and ongoing process to aid in making decisions around continued program support and expansion.