|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910155151703321 |
|
|
Autore |
Fowkes James <1984-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Building the constitution : the practice of constitutional interpretation in post-apartheid South Africa / / James Fowkes [[electronic resource]] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-316-86687-4 |
1-316-86795-1 |
1-316-86813-3 |
1-316-40385-8 |
1-316-86831-1 |
1-316-86849-4 |
1-316-86903-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (xxi, 392 pages) : digital, PDF file(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Cambridge studies in constitutional law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classificazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Constitutional courts - South Africa |
Constitutional law - South Africa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 28 Feb 2017). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Taking reality (legally) seriously -- Voting rights, politics, and trust -- The role of the court : standard conceptions -- The role of the court : constitution-building -- LGBTI equality -- Democracy -- Socio-economic rights -- Equality, eviction and engagement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This revisionary perspective on South Africa's celebrated Constitutional Court draws on historical and empirical sources alongside conventional legal analysis to show how support from the African National Congress government and other political actors has underpinned the Court's landmark cases, which are often applauded too narrowly as merely judicial achievements. Standard accounts see the Court as overseer of a negotiated constitutional compromise and as the looked-to guardian of that constitution against the rising threat of the ANC. However, in reality South African successes have been built on broader and more admirable constitutional politics to a degree no previous account has described or acknowledged. The Court has responded to this context with a substantially consistent but widely misunderstood pattern of |
|
|
|
|