Libertés et libéralismes : formation et circulation des concepts / / sous la direction de Jean-Louis Fournel, Jacques Guilhaumou et Jean-Pierre Potier ; Jean-Christophe Angaut [and twenty others]

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910139974603321
• Autore: Jean-Pierre Potier Jean-Louis Fournel, Jacques Guilhaumou
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: ENS Éditions, 2012; Lyon, [France] : , : ENS Éditions, , 2012; ©2012
• ISBN: 2-84788-610-9
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (464 pages) : digital file(s)
• Collana: Gouvernement en Question(s)
• Disciplina: 320.51
• Soggetti: Liberalism; Liberty; Social contract
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Francese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Description based upon print version of record.
• Nota di contenuto: Débats politiques sur la liberté individuelle et raisons langagières dans l'émergence du mot individualismeDÉMARCATIONS; Hegel et le libéralisme; Boris Nikolaevitch Tchitchérine, un libéral russe; Anarchisme et libéralisme. Une démarcation; Léon Walras, un économiste socialiste libéral; Les mutations de la gauche contemporaine à l'aune du concept de social-libéralisme; La question de l'État de droit chez Michel Foucault; EXPÉRIENCES; De la liberté en terre autocratique. Le moment décembriste (1801-1825)
• Sommario/riassunto: This book starts from the observation that there is no reflection on liberalism without thought of freedom, but that all thought of freedom cannot be included in the various forms of liberalism. The two words which are at the start of this questioning refer to empirical or conceptual realities and to a priori different chronologies. Liberty refers to a thousand-year-old problematic, existing since men reflect on the possible forms of living together. Liberalism refers more to a body of doctrine that has its origin in an interpretation of the driving role of freedom for trade and the forms of organization of society. The challenge of this collection of studies, transdisciplinary by choice and ; by necessity, is to confront the two notions in their uses and their history. This book thus proposes a more detailed cartography of these concepts than those proposed by the analytical literature (whether it is Isaiah Berlin's dual categorization opposing positive freedom and negative freedom or the now fixed opposition between liberalism and republicanism). One of the results of the enterprise is thus to provide a principle for explaining the diversity of liberalisms, which contemporary literature too often attempts to describe, independently of the historical moments of their institutionalisation.