| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910137203003321 |
|
|
Autore |
David Zachary Hambrick |
|
|
Titolo |
Psychological perspectives on expertise / / topic editors, Guillermo Campitelli, Michael H. Connors, Merim Bilalić and David Zachary Hambrick |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Frontiers Media SA, 2015 |
|
[Lausanne, Switzerland] : , : Frontiers Media SA, , 2015 |
|
©2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (240 pages) : illustrations (colour); digital file(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Frontiers Research Topics, , 1664-8714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
"Published in: Frontiers in Psychology" -- front cover. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Experts are persons who are very knowledgeable about or skillful in a particular area. The aim of this Research Topic is to advance knowledge in the understanding of the phenomenon of expertise by putting together different lines of research that directly or indirectly study expertise. Herbert Simon's expertise studies initiated two lines of research. One is interested in elucidating the cognitive processes underlying expertise, and the other investigates how expertise develops. These lines of research started with studies comparing experts and novices in chess, and then they extended to numerous areas of expertise such as music, medical diagnosis, sports, arts and sciences. In the field of judgment and decision making researchers investigate the quality of judgments and decisions of experts in different professions (e.g., clinical psychologists, medical practitioners, judges, meteorologists, stock brokers). Those lines of research explicitly investigate the topic of expertise, but there are other research areas that make a substantial contribution to understanding expertise. Scholars in language acquisition and in face perception, for example, investigate cognitive processes and development of expertise in areas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in which almost everyone becomes an expert. Furthermore, skill acquisition research informs in detail about short term cognitive changes that may be important to understand how expertise develops. We are interested in original research that advances knowledge in the understanding of decision making, cognitive processes and development of expertise in sports, intellectual games, arts, scientific disciplines and professions, as well as expertise in cognitive abilities such as perception, memory, attention, language and imagery. We are also interested in theoretical articles in any of these areas, articles that describe computational or mathematical models of expertise, and articles offering a framework that would guide expertise research. Articles that offer integrative approaches of some of the areas described above are strongly encouraged. The goal of this Research Topic is to produce a hallmark piece of work in the field of expertise, which complements and does not overlap with the "Neural implementations of expertise" Research Topic in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910987826103321 |
|
|
Autore |
Davies Gail |
|
|
Titolo |
Researching animal research : What the humanities and social sciences can contribute to laboratory animal science and welfare / / ed. by Beth Greenhough, Gail Davies, Pru Hobson-West, Robert G. W. Kirk, Alexandra Palmer, Emma Roe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Manchester, : Manchester University Press, 2024 |
|
Manchester : , : Manchester University Press, , [2024] |
|
©2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-5261-6576-7 |
1-5261-6577-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (480 p.) : 25 b&w images |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
SOCIAL SCIENCE / Human Geography |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Front Matter -- Contents -- List of figures and tables -- List of contributors -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- I Changing and implementing regulation -- 1 A ‘fragile consensus’? The origins of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 -- 2 Outside of regulations, outside of imaginations -- 3 ‘The place for a dog is in the home’ -- 4 Commentaries on changing and implementing regulation -- II Culturing and sustaining care -- 5 Subjugated love -- 6 Culturing care in animal research -- 7 The good aquarist -- 8 Commentaries on culturing and sustaining care -- III Distributing expertise and accountability -- 9 (Dis)placing veterinary medicine -- 10 ‘Field folk’ -- 11 ‘Knowledge is power, and I do want to know more’ -- 12 ‘Bred, but not used’ -- 13 Commentaries on distributing expertise and accountability -- IV Experimenting with openness and engagement -- 14 The Mouse Exchange -- 15 Labelling medicines as developed using animals? Opening up the topic of animal research -- 16 Building participation through fictional worlds -- 17 Commentaries on experimenting with openness and engagement -- Afterword -- Select bibliography -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Every year around 80 million scientific procedures are carried out on animals globally. These experiments have the potential to generate new understandings of biology and clinical treatments. They also give rise to ongoing societal debate. This book demonstrates how the humanities and social sciences can contribute to understanding what is created through animal procedures – including constitutional forms of research governance, different institutional cultures of care, the professional careers of scientists and veterinarians, collaborations with patients and publics, and research animals, specially bred for experiments or surplus to requirements. Developing the idea of the animal research nexus, this book explores how connections and disconnections are made between these different elements, how these have reshaped each other historically, and how they configure the current practice and policy of UK animal research. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |