|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910136537103321 |
|
|
Autore |
La Botz Dan |
|
|
Titolo |
What went wrong? : the Nicaraguan Revolution : a Marxist analysis / / by Dan La Botz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Leiden, Netherlands : , : Brill, , 2016 |
|
©2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (429 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Historical Materialism Book Series, , 1570-1522 ; ; Volume 127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Counterrevolutions - Nicaragua |
Nicaragua History Revolution, 1979 |
Nicaragua Politics and government 1990- |
Nicaragua Politics and government 20th century |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Front Matter -- What Happened to the Nicaraguan Revolution? -- Nicaragua: A Nation but Not a State (from the Beginning to 1893) -- The Struggle to Construct a Sovereign State: Zelaya and Sandino (1893–1932) -- The Somoza Dynastic Dictatorship (1936–75) -- The Founding of the Sandinista Front for National Liberation (1962–78) -- The Sandinista Revolution (1975–79) -- The Sandinistas in Power (1979–84) -- The Sandinistas and the Contra War (1985–90) -- Violeta Chamorro: A New Ruling Class, a New State, a New Economy (1990–96) -- Alemán and Bolaños: Corruption in Power (1996–2006) -- The Ortega Government (2006–) -- Results and Prospects -- Bibliography -- Index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This volume is a valuable re-assessment of the Nicaraguan Revolution by a Marxist historian of Latin American political history. It shows that the FSLN (‘the Sandinistas’), with politics principally shaped by Soviet and Cuban Communism, never had a commitment to genuine democracy either within the revolutionary movement or within society at large; that the FSLN’s lack of commitment to democracy was a key factor in the way that revolution was betrayed from the 1970s to the 1990s; and that the FSLN’s lack of rank-and-file democracy left all |
|
|
|
|