CENELEC 50128 and IEC 62279 standards / / Jean-Louis Boulanger

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910131321303321
• Autore: Boulanger Jean-Louis
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: Hoboken, New Jersey : , : iSTE/Wiley, , 2015
• ISBN: 1-119-00505-1
• Edizione: [1st ed.]
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (380 p.)
• Collana: Control, systems and industrial engineering series
• Disciplina: 625.16
• Soggetti: Electric cables - Standards; Electric wiring - Standards
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Description based upon print version of record.
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
• Nota di contenuto: Cover; Title Page; Copyright ; Contents; Introduction; I.1. Objective; I.2. Reminder; I.3. Overview; 1: From the System to the Software; 1.1. Introduction; 1.2. Command/control system; 1.3. System; 1.4. Software application; 1.4.1. What is software?; 1.4.2. Different types of software; 1.4.3. The software application in its proper context; 1.5. Conclusion; 2: Railway Standards; 2.1. Introduction; 2.2. Generic standards; 2.2.1. Introduction; 2.2.2. Safety levels; 2.3. History between CENELEC and the IEC; 2.4. CENELEC referential framework; 2.4.1. Introduction; 2.4.2. Description; 2.4.3. Implementation2.4.4. Software safety; 2.4.5. Safety versus availability; 2.5. EN 50155 standard; 2.6. CENELEC 50128; 2.6.1. Introduction; 2.6.2. SSIL management; 2.6.2.1. SSIL attribution; 2.6.2.2. Choice of SSIL; 2.6.3. Comparison of 2001 and 2011 versions; 2.6.3.1. CENELEC 50128:2001; 2.6.3.2. EN 50128:2011; 2.7. Conclusion; 3: Risk and Safety Integrity Level; 3.1. Introduction; 3.2. Basic definitions; 3.3. Safety enforcement; 3.3.1. What is safety?; 3.3.2. Safety management; 3.3.3. Safety integrity; 3.3.4. Determination of the SIL; 3.3.5. SIL table; 3.3.6. Allocation of SILs; 3.3.7. SIL management3.3.8. Software SIL; 3.3.9. Iterative process; 3.3.10. Identification of safety requirements; 3.4. In IEC 61508 and IEC 61511; 3.4.1. Risk graph; 3.4.2. LOPA; 3.4.3. Overview; 3.5. Conclusion; 4: Software Assurance; 4.1. Introduction; 4.2. Prerequisites; 4.3. Quality assurance; 4.3.1. Introduction; 4.3.2. Quality assurance management; 4.3.2.1. Prescriptions of standard in force; ; 4.3.2.2. ISO 9001:2008; 4.3.2.3. Indicator; 4.3.3. Realization of a software application; 4.3.4. Software quality assurance plan (SQAP); 4.4. Organization; 4.4.1. Typical organization; 4.4.2. Skill management4.5. Configuration management; 4.6. Safety assurance management; 4.7. Verification and validation; 4.7.1. Introduction; 4.7.2. Verification; 4.7.2.1. Presentation; 4.7.2.2. Activity of verification; 4.7.2.3. Static analysis; 4.7.2.4. Dynamic analysis; 4.7.2.4.1. Test strategy; 4.7.2.4.2. Coverage of tests; 4.7.2.5. Summary; 4.7.3. Validation; 4.8. Independent assessment; 4.9. Tool qualification; 4.10. Conclusion; 4.11. Appendix A: list of quality documents to be produced; 4.12. Appendix B: structure of a software quality assurance plan; 5: Requirements Management; 5.1. Introduction5.2. Requirements acquisition phase; 5.2.1. Introduction; 5.2.2. Requirements elicitation; 5.2.2.1. Introduction; 5.2.2.2. Identification of stakeholders; 5.2.2.3. Identification of sources; 5.2.3. Process of analysis and documentation; 5.2.3.1. Subdivision of the process; 5.2.3.2. Requirements analysis phase; 5.2.3.2.1. Objectives; 5.2.3.2.2. Elicitation techniques; 5.2.3.2.3. Interview techniques; 5.2.3.2.4. Prototyping and simulation techniques; 5.2.3.3. Description production phase; 5.2.4. Verification and validation of the requirements; 5.2.4.1. Introduction; 5.2.4.2. Verification
• Sommario/riassunto: CENELEC EN 50128 and IEC 62279 standards are applicable to the performance of software in the railway sector. The 2011 version of the 50128 standard firms up the techniques and methods to be implemented. This is a guide to its implementation, in order to understand the foundations of the standard and how it impacts on the activities to be undertaken, helping towards better a preparation for the independent evaluation phase, which is mandatory.