1.

Record Nr.

UNINA990008198550403321

Autore

Proust, Louis

Titolo

Les iles Canaries : description de l'archipel / L. Proust et J. Pitard

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Paris : Guilmoto, stampa 1908

Descrizione fisica

320 p., [17] c., 1 c. ripieg. : ill. ; 24 cm

Altri autori (Persone)

Pitard, Charles Joseph <1873-1927>

Locazione

ILFGE

Collocazione

J-02-020

Lingua di pubblicazione

Francese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

2.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910789401503321

Autore

Gillette Clayton P

Titolo

Local redistribution and local democracy [[electronic resource] ] : interest groups and the courts / / Clayton P. Gillette

Pubbl/distr/stampa

New Haven, : Yale University Press, c2011

ISBN

1-283-15062-X

9786613150622

0-300-17182-X

Descrizione fisica

xiii, 235 p

Disciplina

339.20973

Soggetti

Distribution (Economic theory)

Local government - United States

Local finance - United States

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

The scope of local competence -- Why does local autonomy matter? --



The meaning and scope of local redistribution -- Why do local governments redistribute? -- Local political markets and state constitutional constraints -- Proxies for distinguishing benign and malign redistribution -- The limits of judicial intervention -- Conclusion.

Sommario/riassunto

The traditional theory of urban finance argues against local redistribution of wealth on the assumption that such action is likely to chase away the relatively wealthy, leaving only the impoverished behind. Nevertheless, Clayton P. Gillette observes, local governments engage in substantial redistribution, both to the wealthy and to the poor.In this thoughtful book, Gillette examines whether recent campaigns to enact "living wage" ordinances and other local redistributive programs represent gaps in the traditional theory or political opportunism. He then investigates the role of the courts in distinguishing between these explanations. The author argues that courts have greater capacity to review local programs than is typically assumed. He concludes that when a single interest group dominates the political process, judicial intervention to determine a program's legal validity may be appropriate. But if the political contest involves competing groups, courts should defer to local political judgments.