La Milesia e Apuleio / Antonio Mazzarino

• Record Nr.: UNINA990005752250403321
• Autore: Mazzarino, Antonio
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: Torino : Chiantore, 1950
• Descrizione fisica: 164 p., 1 c. di tav. ; 22 cm
• Locazione: FLFBC
• Collocazione: P2B-650-APUL.8M.A.-1950; P2B-650-APUL.8M.A.-1950 BIS; I A 33*
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Italiano
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia

Computational models of argument [[electronic resource] ] : Proceedings of COMMA 2012 / / edited by Bart Verheij, Stefan Szeider and Stefan Woltran

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910785991603321
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: Amsterdam, : IOS Press, 2012
• ISBN: 1-299-33330-3; 1-61499-111-1
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (536 p.)
• Collana: Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications Computational models of argument
• Altri autori (Persone): VerheijBart; SzeiderStefan; WotlranStefan
• Disciplina: 003.5
• Soggetti: Artificial intelligence - Computer simulation; Reasoning - Computer simulation
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Description based upon print version of record.
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
• Nota di contenuto: Title Page; Preface; Programme Committee; Additional Reviewers; Contents; Part I. Invited Talks; The Long and Winding Road: Forty Years of Argumentation; Formal Dialectic: From Aristotle to Pragma-Dialectics, and Beyond; Multiple Logics Within Argument: How Defeasible and Classical Reasoning Work Together; Part II. Innovative Applications; Some Facets of Argument Mining for Opinion Analysis; An Inquiry Learning Environment for Scientific Argumentation; Semi-Automated Argumentative Analysis of Online Product Reviews; Arguing with Preferences in EcoBioCap; An Analysis and Hypothesis Generation Platform for Heterogeneous Cancer DatabasesMaking Sense of Macro- and Micro-Argumentation in Policy-Deliberation: Visualisation Techniques and Representation Formats; Towards an Argument-Based Music Recommender System; Arguing About Firewall Policy; Part III. Regular Papers; A General QBF-Based Formalization of Abstract Argumentation Theory; Some Foundations for Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation; Argument Aggregation: Basic Axioms and Complexity Results; The Equational Approach to CF2 Semantics; Argumentation Games for Admissibility and Cogency CriteriaUniform Argumentation Frameworks; Dishonest Arguments in Debate Games; On the Use of Presumptions in Structured Defeasible Reasoning; Automated Deployment of Argumentation Protocols; On Preferred Extension Enumeration in Abstract Argumentation; Towards Experimental Algorithms for Abstract Argumentation; A Dialogue Game for Coalition Structure Generation with Self-Interested Agents; Complexity of Logic-Based Argumentation in Schaefer's Framework; Argumentation Dialogues for Two-Agent Conflict Resolution; Comparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation SemanticsComputational Aspects of cf2 and stage2 Argumentation Semantics; Tactics and Concessions for Argumentation-Based Negotiation; Default Reasoning About Actions via Abstract Argumentation; Resolutions in Structured Argumentation; Mechanism Design for Argumentation-Based Persuasion; Persuasion Strategies for Argumentation About Plans; Selecting Extensions in Weighted Argumentation Frameworks; Group Persuasion Through Uncertain Audience Modelling; On Input/Output Argumentation Frameworks; Dialogue Templates for Automatic Argument Processing; Valued-Based Argumentation for Tree-Like Value GraphsInterchanging Arguments Between Carneades and AIF; Towards Argument-Based Foundation for Sceptical and Credulous Dialogue Games; The Structure of Ad Hominem Dialogues; Towards Argumentation About Subjective Probabilities; Argument Schemes for Reasoning About Trust; Clarifying Some Misconceptions on the ASPIC+ Framework; Generating Abstract Arguments: A Natural Language Approach; Towards Argumentation with Symbolic Dempster-Shafer Evidence; Conditional Acceptance Functions; Grounded Semantics as Persuasion Dialogue; Picking the Right Expert to Make a Debate Uncontroversial