| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNICAMPANIASUN0123510 |
|
|
Autore |
Hofrichter, Julian |
|
|
Titolo |
Information Geometry and Population Genetics : the Mathematical Structure of the Wright-Fisher Model / Julian Hofrichter, Jurgen Jost, Tat Dat Tran |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
xii, 319 p., : ill. ; 24 cm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[Cham : Springer, 2017] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
Pubblicazione in formato elettronico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
Jost, Jürgen |
Tran, Tat Dat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
92-XX - Biology and other natural sciences [MSC 2020] |
94A17 - Measures of information, entropy [MSC 2020] |
92D25 - Population dynamics (general) [MSC 2020] |
92D10 - Genetics and epigenetics [MSC 2020] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910811692003321 |
|
|
Autore |
Hurlbut J. Benjamin |
|
|
Titolo |
Experiments in democracy : human embryo research and the politics of bioethics / / J. Benjamin Hurlbut |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York, [New York] : , : Columbia University Press, , 2017 |
|
©2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (376 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Columbia scholarship online |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Human embryo - Research - Government policy - United States |
Stem cells - Research - Moral and ethical aspects - United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Previously issued in print: 2017. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction: The Politics of Experiment -- 1. New Beginnings -- 2. Producing Life, Conceiving Reason -- 3. Representing Reason -- 4. Cloning, Knowledge, and the Politics of Consensus -- 5. Confusing Deliberation -- 6. In the Laboratories of Democracy -- 7. Religion, Reason, and the Politics of Progress -- 8. The Legacy of Experiment -- Notes -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Human embryo research touches upon strongly felt moral convictions, and it raises such deep questions about the promise and perils of scientific progress that debate over its development has become a moral and political imperative. From in vitro fertilization to embryonic stem cell research, cloning, and gene editing, Americans have repeatedly struggled with how to define the moral status of the human embryo, whether to limit its experimental uses, and how to contend with sharply divided public moral perspectives on governing science.Experiments in Democracy presents a history of American debates over human embryo research from the late 1960s to the present, exploring their crucial role in shaping norms, practices, and institutions of deliberation governing the ethical challenges of modern bioscience. J. Benjamin Hurlbut details how scientists, bioethicists, policymakers, and other public figures have attempted to answer a question of great consequence: how should the public reason about aspects of science and technology that effect fundamental dimensions of human life? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through a study of one of the most significant science policy controversies in the history of the United States, Experiments in Democracy paints a portrait of the complex relationship between science and democracy, and of U.S. society's evolving approaches to evaluating and governing science's most challenging breakthroughs. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |